Vulnerability assessment
Turn vulnerabilities into evidence-based remediation priorities.
Technical discovery, validation and context distinguish long finding lists from risks that demonstrably need attention.
Discuss your challengeDiscovery and controlled analysis
Within an explicitly authorised scope, we examine systems, services, configurations and exposure. Automated results are validated manually where appropriate to reduce false positives and incorrect conclusions.
- Asset and service discovery
- Vulnerable versions and misconfiguration
- Technical validation within the agreed scope
Prioritisation with context
A severity score alone does not determine actual risk. We combine technical severity with reachability, existing controls, potential impact and the role of the affected system.
- Technical severity and exploitability
- External and internal exposure
- Business context and compensating controls
Reporting and remediation
Findings are documented reproducibly with evidence, impact and realistic remediation options. After changes, we can retest whether the risk has actually been reduced.
- Evidence-based technical findings
- Remediation advice and ownership
- Retesting and status reporting
Clear boundary with penetration testing
A vulnerability assessment is not an unrestricted attack simulation. Exploitation or advanced attack chaining is performed only under a separate, explicit mandate with appropriate testing arrangements.
- Written authorisation and scope
- Agreed test window and stop conditions
- Secure handling of obtained data
Discuss a technical challenge?